Conversation: Wired Blog-- GameLife (Re-Write)
Original Post:
(The opening post initiated the conversation by reporting on an incident and then including personal opinion. Bill Gates, and Microsoft in general, are known for either buying-out the competition or copying it, and when Bill Gates said that he would like to have a technology that could simulate the swing of a bat, Chris Kohler (the author) points out that there is already such a technology, the Wii, and it happens to be made by Nintendo, a competitor of Microsoft. I personally think that the Wii has met with success because it dared to depart from the traditional archetype of consoles and has reached out to a wider audience. It is currently beating the Xbox 360 and the PS3 because it is cheaper and appealing to people outside of the traditional gamer demographic.)Bill Gates: One Day, Video Games Will Let You Swing a Tennis Racket
From Bill Gates' and Steve Jobs' joint presentation at the D5 conference, some ruminations from the Microsoft big cheese about the future of motion-sensing video games:
He went on to explain that he's talking about video recognition -- a camera that watches you swing an actual tennis racket, then translates that imagery into game data. Then again, what's the difference, really, besides the fact that one of those technologies already works and the other one doesn't?Gates: Software is doing vision and so, you know, imagine a game machine where you’re just going to pick up the bat and swing it or the tennis racket and swing it.
[the moderators say he's describing the Wii]
Gates: No, that’s not it. You can’t pick up your tennis racket. And swing it.
Comments: (6)
Obviously, Bill's really talking about the EyeToy from Sony, rather than the Wii.
(This post is defending Microsoft in response to the attacks that were made on it in previous posts. By suggesting that Microsoft's "video recognition" would be more accurate and responsive than the Wii currently is, the author is validating Bill Gates' comments. I suppose it would be possible, in a couple decades, to have amazingly accurate video recognition, but currently, and for the forseeable future, the Wii is the best movement recognition out there.)ummm... not really, because if microsoft's video recognition really does work, it will be able to simulate somewhat exact movements. when the wiimote only detects movements, and can't translate the movements into the game.
Please hurry up with this new tennis software. I can't run anymore because of arthritis. I love the game and wish I could play again. I can't wait!
RCR: If anything, I'd say that the Wiimote is far more precise than camera technology is likely to be. The Wiimote has every little bit of data -- the force applied to the controller via the X, Y, and Z axes over time, and can also read absolute position. Of course it can translate these movements into the game, it's just a matter of a game designer doing it.
I eagerly await the day when a camera can do the exact same thing just by eyeballing someone's off-the-shelf tennis racket...
Ms. Jean: Buy a Wii!
I hope tennis rackets and baseball bats are equipped with *very* strong wrist straps in the future.

(This comment agrees with the original post and adds additional reasoning. I agree with this, and believe that Gates is trying to steal the thunder of Nintendo.)