Monday, June 4, 2007

Conversation: Wired Blog-- GameLife

Original Post:


Bill Gates: One Day, Video Games Will Let You Swing a Tennis Racket

By Chris Kohler EmailJune 04, 2007 | 3:56:30 PMCategories: Console Games

Tennis_racketFrom Bill Gates' and Steve Jobs' joint presentation at the D5 conference, some ruminations from the Microsoft big cheese about the future of motion-sensing video games:

Gates: Software is doing vision and so, you know, imagine a game machine where you’re just going to pick up the bat and swing it or the tennis racket and swing it.

[the moderators say he's describing the Wii]

Gates: No, that’s not it. You can’t pick up your tennis racket. And swing it.

He went on to explain that he's talking about video recognition -- a camera that watches you swing an actual tennis racket, then translates that imagery into game data. Then again, what's the difference, really, besides the fact that one of those technologies already works and the other one doesn't?
(The opening post initiated the conversation by reporting on an incident and then including personal opinion. Bill Gates, and Microsoft in general, are known for either buying-out the competition or copying it, and when Bill Gates said that he would like to have a technology that could simulate the swing of a bat, Chris Kohler (the author) points out that there is already such a technology, the Wii, and it happens to be made by Nintendo, a competitor of Microsoft.)


Comments: (6)

I like how Microsoft have gone from slyly copying other's ideas, such as Firefox's tabbed browsing, and passing them off as their own without much fanfare, to actively trying to steal another's ideas with just the simplest of embellishments in a public forum and then openlly deny it. It you chopped the handle off a racket and replaced with with the Wiimote you have exactly the experience Gates is talking about.

Obviously, Bill's really talking about the EyeToy from Sony, rather than the Wii.

ummm... not really, because if microsoft's video recognition really does work, it will be able to simulate somewhat exact movements. when the wiimote only detects movements, and can't translate the movements into the game.

(This post is defending Microsoft in response to the attacks that were made on it in previous posts. By suggesting that Microsoft's "video recognition" would be more accurate and responsive than the Wii currently is, the author is validating Bill Gates' comments.)

Please hurry up with this new tennis software. I can't run anymore because of arthritis. I love the game and wish I could play again. I can't wait!


RCR: If anything, I'd say that the Wiimote is far more precise than camera technology is likely to be. The Wiimote has every little bit of data -- the force applied to the controller via the X, Y, and Z axes over time, and can also read absolute position. Of course it can translate these movements into the game, it's just a matter of a game designer doing it.

I eagerly await the day when a camera can do the exact same thing just by eyeballing someone's off-the-shelf tennis racket...

Ms. Jean: Buy a Wii!

I hope tennis rackets and baseball bats are equipped with *very* strong wrist straps in the future.

(This post is made partly in jest, in reference to the snapping of wrist straps on wiimotes that reportedly broke several TV's and windows when the remote went flying through the air.)

6 comments:

Christopher said...

This felt like a summary of the events and opinions taking place. The commentary offered mostly an unbiased view on it giving some clarity, although I wished some of the comments tied the dialog together better.

kevlar said...

I like the idea of commenting on another blog like this. It seems editorial in that you seem to be trying to add clarification of what is going on in the original blog. Would be interesting to see some of your own feelings about what is being said as well.

Kurt said...

Definitely a conversation that I found interesting however, I would have enjoyed having more of your opinion in your side comments as opposed to some that were merely summing up what was said.

Jefe said...

I liked what you did with the commentary. Very nice. I thought it was very funny.

AdamsCB said...

Mystery Science Theater 2000. Liked the side perspective and interjections. Formatting tore away the confusion of some other blogs. Simple and effective.

Rahjur said...

As per the verbal comments, I really enjoyed your post. The formatting takes the place of quotes and, imho, does a better job.

At the same time, I'm torn as to how to read your comments, I'm leaning towards you being another conversant, only in a privileged position.

For your revision, I'd like to see you expand on your comments.